California, September 29, 2025
News Summary
California lawmakers have approved Assembly Bill 1064 and Senate Bill 243 to enhance the safety protocols of AI chatbots, specifically targeting the interactions with minors. Amid growing concerns about chatbots promoting harmful behaviors, these bills aim to restrict access to harmful content for users under 18 and require chatbot operators to inform users of their AI identity. Governor Gavin Newsom has until mid-October to decide on these measures, which have sparked debate among tech companies and advocacy groups over the future of AI regulation.
California lawmakers have passed two significant bills aimed at enhancing the safety of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, responding to growing concerns regarding their impact on minors’ mental health. Assembly Bill 1064 and Senate Bill 243 focus specifically on the interaction of young users with chatbots, which have been linked to harmful content including self-harm and sexual exploitation.
Governor Gavin Newsom now faces a deadline to decide whether to approve or reject these bills by mid-October. The legislation has stirred controversy, with tech companies such as OpenAI and Meta expressing opposition, arguing that these restrictions could stifle innovation and the development of beneficial AI technologies.
The measures gained traction following troubling reports of chatbots potentially contributing to incidents of self-harm and suicides among teenagers. In recent cases, parents have filed lawsuits against tech companies, alleging that their chatbots encouraged suicidal thoughts in young users, illuminating the urgent need for regulatory action.
Key Provisions of the Bills
Assembly Bill 1064 includes a provision that prohibits making companion chatbots available to residents under 18 if they could foreseeably cause harm to these users. Meanwhile, Senate Bill 243 establishes new requirements for chatbot operators. They must inform users that they are engaging with an AI and implement preventive measures to obstruct the generation of self-harm content. Furthermore, operators must notify minor users every three hours to remind them to take breaks and emphasize that they are interacting with an AI.
Bipartisan Support and Ongoing Discussions
The passage of these bills has garnered bipartisan support, driven by lawmakers’ commitment to providing better protections against the potential risks posed by AI to minors. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has expressed support for AB 1064, highlighting the importance of addressing these issues promptly.
The legislation includes a private right of action, allowing individuals to sue AI companies for violations, seeking damages of up to $1,000 per violation. This addition reflects a growing recognition that significant accountability measures are necessary in the rapidly evolving landscape of AI technologies.
Response from Tech Companies and Advocacy Groups
Tech lobbying group TechNet agrees with the underlying intentions of the bills but contends that they impose vague restrictions that could limit access to beneficial AI tools. In contrast, advocacy groups are advocating for stronger regulations, fearful that any amendments could dilute protections for young users.
In the backdrop of these discussions, tech companies have started financially supporting Super PACs aimed at opposing stringent regulations, indicating a significant pushback against potential legislative changes. Current AI chatbots like Character.AI and Replika have already faced backlash following negative incidents involving young users, further emphasizing the critical nature of this legislative effort.
Emerging Need for Regulation
As the pace of AI development accelerates, many parents and lawmakers are increasingly concerned about child safety and mental health. Lawmakers argue that commonsense guardrails are required to ensure that AI technologies do not adversely affect minors. With the bills aiming to set a precedent for specific safety measures related to chatbot interactions, California seeks to lead the way in creating more robust protections for young users interacting with AI.
Conclusion
Overall, California’s legislative efforts reflect a concerted response to the growing apprehension regarding AI’s influence on minors. The outcome of these bills will play a significant role in shaping the landscape of AI chatbot interactions, with implications extending beyond the state.
FAQ
What are the two bills passed by California lawmakers regarding AI chatbots?
California lawmakers have passed Assembly Bill 1064 and Senate Bill 243 aimed at enhancing the safety of artificial intelligence chatbots.
What must Governor Gavin Newsom decide concerning these bills?
Governor Gavin Newsom must decide whether to approve or reject these bills by mid-October.
What do the bills aim to address?
The bills aim to address concerns about chatbots exposing minors to harmful content, including self-harm and sexual exploitation.
What does Assembly Bill 1064 prohibit?
AB 1064 prohibits making companion chatbots available to California residents under 18 if they could foreseeably harm the user.
What does Senate Bill 243 require from chatbot operators?
SB 243 mandates chatbot operators to inform users they are interacting with an AI and implement measures to prevent self-harm content generation.
Do these bills have support from lawmakers?
Yes, there is bipartisan support for the legislation, driven by the need for better protections against risks posed by AI to young users.
What kind of actions can individuals take under Senate Bill 243?
Senate Bill 243 includes a private right of action, allowing individuals to sue AI companies for violations, seeking damages of up to $1,000 per violation.
Comparison Chart
| Bill | Key Features |
|---|---|
| Assembly Bill 1064 | Prohibits companion chatbots for users under 18 if they could foreseeably cause harm. |
| Senate Bill 243 | Mandates chatbots to inform users they are AI and prevent self-harm content; allows users to sue for violations. |
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
- Los Angeles Times: California Lawmakers Passed Bills to Regulate AI Chatbots
- TechCrunch: California Bill Regulating AI Companion Chatbots
- StateScoop: California Bill Targeting Harmful Chatbots
- Sacramento Bee: California’s Legislative Efforts on AI Chatbots
- Wikipedia: Regulation and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Artificial Intelligence
- Google Search: AI Chatbot Regulations
Author: STAFF HERE HUNTINGTON BEACH
The Huntington Beach Staff Writer represents the experienced team at HEREHuntingtonBeach.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Huntington Beach, Orange County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as the Huntington Beach Surf City USA Marathon, the U.S. Open of Surfing, Fourth of July celebrations at the Huntington Beach Pier, and community festivals at Huntington Beach Central Park. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visit Huntington Beach, plus leading businesses in retail, hospitality, and outdoor recreation that drive the local economy. As part of the broader HERE network, including HEREAnaheim.com, HERECostaMesa.com, HERESantaAna.com, and HERELosAngeles.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into Southern California's dynamic landscape.
