News Summary

The House of Representatives voted to block California’s plans to ban new gas-powered vehicle sales by 2035, revoking an EPA waiver. Bipartisan support marked the resolution’s passage, with implications for environmental regulations and consumer choices across the U.S. Opponents of the decision argue it undermines California’s climate leadership. The debate reflects tensions between state and federal regulatory powers in environmental policy, as legal challenges from California officials may arise in response to this legislative action.

California

On May 1, 2025, the House of Representatives voted to block California’s ambitious plans to prohibit the sale of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035. The resolution, known as House Joint Resolution 88, passed with a tally of 246 votes in favor and 164 against. This legislation aims to revoke a waiver granted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that allowed California to enforce this ban during the Biden administration.

The vote showcased bipartisan support, with 211 Republicans and 35 Democrats endorsing the measure. Proponents, including co-sponsors from California, argued that it represents a significant win for consumers and the automotive market, asserting that the preferences of one state should not override the choices available to all Americans.

Details of the Vote

The House’s decision was accompanied by two additional measures that targeted California’s environmental initiatives: one aimed at withdrawing waivers related to the sales of zero-emissions trucks, which passed with a vote of 231-191, and another addressing nitrogen oxide emission standards, which saw a 225-196 approval. These actions reflect a concerted effort by certain members of Congress to challenge California’s authority in setting stringent vehicle emission and sales regulations.

Background on California’s Gas-Powered Vehicle Ban

California Governor Gavin Newsom enacted an executive order in 2020 stopping the sale of new gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035. This order tasked the California Air Resources Board with developing essential regulations but did not outlaw the ownership or sales of pre-owned gasoline vehicles. Newsom’s initiative aimed to significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution in the state, aligning with the environmental priorities of numerous advocates.

Newsom’s administration has defended the state’s regulatory authority, arguing that it originates from the legislative actions of past Republican leaders. Furthermore, the governor’s office has criticized the House’s recent actions as unconstitutional and in violation of established Congressional Review Act (CRA) procedures, stating that those opposing the waiver are misapplying the law.

Reactions to the House Vote

Following the vote, various stakeholders expressed their views. Supporters of the legislation hailed it as a victory for consumer rights, while detractors voiced concerns that revoking the waiver undermines California’s recognized leadership in climate policy and could adversely affect economic growth linked to emerging vehicle technologies. Critics of the resolution cite potential risks of setting a precedent that could destabilize existing environmental protections across states.

In addition, eleven other states have committed to adopting California’s proposed ban by 2035, collectively impacting up to 40% of the U.S. automotive market. Environmental and public health advocates endorse the ban, forecasting substantial improvements in air quality, while opposing views emphasize the importance of preserving consumer choice regarding vehicle types.

Future Implications and Legal Context

The Senate Parliamentarian has determined that the EPA waiver does not fall under the CRA’s regulatory scope, a ruling that complicates efforts to withdraw the waiver effectively. As this debate unfolds, some members of Congress suspect that proceeding with this resolution could provoke legal challenges from California officials. The California Attorney General has indicated that such actions may be forthcoming, highlighting the potential for ongoing legal confrontations regarding state and federal powers in environmental regulation.

As the situation continues to evolve, the implications of the House’s decision will likely resonate throughout the automotive industry, consumer behavior, and state versus federal authority dynamics in environmental regulation.

House Blocks California’s Gas-Powered Vehicle Ban